Freedom; what it is, and what it is not.

    Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders of America knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great society. Yet the founders of America chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on the freedom or liberties of others.

   In this light the government at all levels has lost sight by the introduction of laws that changes us from the freest nation on earth into a nation of serfs. This raises the question about the purpose or value of laws beyond those set forth in our founding.

   A law does not make a person behave in any specific way; it only represents a threat of reprisal and cannot stop a free person from taking the liberty to violate it. The sum of more laws only means more punishments and imprisonment to be carried-out by the government on the free people of our nation. Our laws should be more like; “don’t sweat the small violations and all violations are small”. Did or have you ever considered why the founders didn’t create a civil or federal police force and left policing if necessary to we the people. That as we as a nation grew we didn’t create law enforcement agencies we created police agencies for the purpose of keeping the peace, not enforcing the laws but to protect us from violence and crime and investigation, where law enforcement was strictly the purview of the legal system and the courts.

   Today our government has changed policing into surveillance of everything we do, and call it law enforcement that’s what is called a “police state” which no longer allows the liberty of being free people.

   I view myself as a free person and if someone or group approaches me in an aggressive manner and worse yet is armed I will perceive it as a threat and will aggressively defend myself, and a uniform or badge is not a permission slip for such behavior. GAP

P.S. America is a nation that desperately needs to be reset and rebooted.

  What young or otherwise modern man can read the following wisdom from these great men, white or otherwise and conclude they know better or some how human nature has changed over time which would render them old and inapplicable to modern times. I would say only fools and imbeciles! GAP 

 Just sampling;

"As our president bears no resemblance to a king so we shall see the Senate has no similitude to nobles. First, not being hereditary, their collective knowledge, wisdom, and virtue are not precarious. For by these qualities alone are they to obtain their offices, and they will have none of the peculiar qualities and vices of those men who possess power merely because their father held it before them." --Tench Coxe, An American Citizen, No. 2, 1787

"The foundation of national morality must be laid in private families." --John Adams

"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it." --Thomas Paine, The Crisis, no. 4, 1777

"Law and liberty cannot rationally become the objects of our love, unless they first become the objects of our knowledge." --James Wilson, Of the Study of the Law in the United States, 1790

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." --Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishment, quoted by Thomas Jefferson in Commonplace Book

"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression." --Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, 1801

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense  raised in the United States." --Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, 1787

"The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man." --James Madison

"There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." --George Washington

"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." --Patrick Henry

"If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift, and voluntarily become a slave." --John Adams, Rights of the Colonists, 1772

"It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Thomas Jefferson

"A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species." --James Madison, Essay on Property, 1792

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic." --Joseph Story

                                                  What the Tea Party is all about

   The following immortal words expressed for all time by Samuel Adams is why the Tea Party movement exists. It’s to confront those liberals, communists, Islamists and all those that support them that have in concert and with malice of forethought thru the auspices of the democrat party, infiltrated all ranks of our American government and are expressly in the process of fundamentally changing the long standing relationship between “We The People” and our government (Our Constitution) that our forefathers sacrificed so much for lest it all have been in vain.   GAP  

"Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say, 'What should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" --Samuel Adams

  We Americans have become so comfortable in our wallows we can no longer see the treachery within our gates of freedom. We have been infiltrated by the worst of the worst yet we still beg tolerance and patience of those who are fully aware, while the American dream; and the city upon the hill are coming down upon us. We as a nation of free men and women are being dismantled by both foreign and domestic interlopers from within. It is almost with glee that we not only watch, but encourage our own demise.

   We no longer need to wonder or question why and how a single man speaking gibberish can mesmerize an entire nation such as Germany, and no one tried to stop it. For we are in the early stages of the identical process by which they succumbed to Hitler’s’ rants, and like him; tears apart original and long establish laws and puts himself and his crazy ideas above the welfare of his nation, until its total destruction. We think we are immune from the same fate but human nature is about to send not only we Americans, but the entire world back into the dark ages of human history. The point of no return is in view, all we have to do is open our minds eyes. The mind truly is a terrible thing to waste.

   Back in the 1950s on the TV show bandstand, the host of the show traditionally would ask the kids in the audience what it was about a particular new song they liked, the standard clique as a response was “aaah I like the rhythm” it was usually a lousy song but performed by someone they liked. I fear that is how we are responding to our new president’s song and dance, “aaaah we just like the rhythm”. Who says history doesn’t repeat itself? 

   Benjamin Franklin said it best with brevity, when he said; “Here comes the orator with his flood of words and drop of reason”.

And from me G.A.P.; As a Nation made up of free and sovereign citizens diversity in the objects of our industries is our strength, diversity of our purpose is our weakness.  

                                                    Community organizer my ass

  “Community organizing” is an American tradition carried forward from our very beginnings that has been bastardized over time by Communism. Today’s communities throughout America have very little to no Idea of the true American nature of “Community organizing” verses what the likes of socialists/communists call it.

   Our Constitution was designed with the idea and principals that government was not to get involved with the various communities until the problems of any given community were beyond the scope of what the community it’s self could do in it’s own self interests and even then it had no right or power to impose it’s self, but only then by request from the community and deemed to be equal and necessary to the entire State of various communities.

   Everything from public safety to sanitation fell under the responsibility of local communities to provide for themselves the degree to which they themselves felt necessary. That is where “Community organizing came into its own. From organizing policing, jails, fire protection, sanitation, barn raisings, posses, schools, churches, Water co-ops and many other such co-ops designed by, for and of its own capacity. Each community contributed to the state where the state would assist other communities in there individual efforts of development mostly to provide community organizing but again not to impose standards beyond the established communities minimums.

   In America community organizing is as natural a thing to do as eating and there are always members in every community who will willingly take it on in the interest of the community in which they themselves live.

   All I have said here is American historical fact but the one thing community organizing is not is collectively getting together to coerce different levels of government to politically help the community or portions of it with money or other aid from other Americans transferred into your community that is socialism/communism. “community organizing’ is simply organizing the community on how to help itself, not steal from others.

   The bottom line is this; Obama was not and is not a community organizer in an American sense he is a community organizer in a communist way of development only. If your community cannot do it for it’s self it doesn’t need it, it just wants a handout.
GAP

   Bulimia, anorexia, schizophrenia, psychopathic behavior, liberalism, religions etc, are in fact SD’s (social diseases) imposed on individuals in any given society by purposely created propaganda. The purpose behind them all is aimed at “power and control” over entire cultures.

   Avoidance of in-depth reasoning by the individual and left to the “experts” also known as the so-called educated elites of a society, where the “propaganda”; is that which is meant to convince every one of that which is false or unknown as truth, which it is not.

   Truth is self-evident where no argument can repudiate and disbelief is not a valid argument no matter name calling and cursing.    GAP

As an American citizen I am an individual sovereign, where ever I am there is a zone of my sovereignty that exists (what ever is within my field of awareness) all that occurs within this zone is of my concern and is subject to my sovereign authority first and foremost. 

Sacred Honor

   Years ago in my youth while reading the Declaration of Independence the last two words “Sacred Honor” jumped out at me like a lightening bolt and why would the founders of America, place that on an equal footing of importance with their very lives and fortunes. It was at that time certain that I realized I didn’t know what they meant, nor if I even possessed such a thing as my own sacred honor and how and where does one acquire such a personally valued thing.

   I set out on a quest to see if others questioned could explain what sacred honor meant to them and if they understood it in the same way, with the same degree of importance as our founders did. What I got was almost as varied as snow flakes from those I questioned. From some with strong religious faith, it was meant the same as the swearing of “so help me God’ in a court of law or pledge while still others thought of it as the honor of trust or responsibility bestowed on them by overall society that they viewed as sacred.

   As I grew older I became convinced that they were talking about truth, honesty and commitment not so much as it related to overall society but to ones own accumulated over time, “objective convictions” regarding their own individual selves. (Being true to ones, own self) living up to their own personal standards as established over time, completely absent what might be called self deceit. This I concluded by reading their own personal writings.

   The difference between public and personal where the personal was of paramount value that was not necessarily in tandem with public perceptions like the difference between a patriot or sunshine patriot that is the sacred honor they placed on par with life and/or fortune which can only be found within.

   Woe be-it onto the Americans of today that have no Sacred Honor on par with our founding fathers, but wallow only in the perceptions of and self deceit of faux public honors. GAP    

The Hallmark of Freedom is Liberty

What’s all the current political controversy in America among the average citizens all about some may ask, while others say, Democrats, Republicans, the rich, the poor, jobs, spending, immigration, wars, Islam, corruption, rights, etc.. But all those things are but smoke clouding the minds of both those that consider themselves; as liberal or conservative and they both view themselves as Patriots.

  Like the old adage from the railroad industry “stop, look, listen” modern Americans have discarded the reason behind the words, while remembering the words only as old hat that does not apply anymore because we modern men/women are intellectually beyond such admonitions.

  Black Americans today equate slavery as the opposite of freedom, yet when given freedom without the liberty to individually exercise that freedom held them under the thumb and whims of the political élites, and all the rest of America has adopted the same point of view. It is not the words that matter but the true historical meaning and understanding of them when we use them.

  Anarchy benefits only the physically strong or those that can amass power through the collective. The collective benefits only those that rank among the elite, on the backs of the majority.

  In the lead up to America's original revolution; the call from the overwhelming majority was not for freedom from Great Britain; it was for “LIBERTY” we were already free, but freedom without liberty from the controlling civil authority, means only limited slavery as apposed to full fledged slavery like that imposed on most of America's blacks at the time. Individual liberty was at the very root purpose of our Constitution by limiting government as to its power to curtail or restrict our liberty to exercise our rights and freedoms given not by government but by our creator.

  In today’s modern America the same issue of “LIBERTY” is the motivating factor behind the so called TEA PARTY movement even though many among them don’t realize it and focus on the smoke.

GAP

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."--Patrick Henry, speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, 5 June 1778

"It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth -- and listen to the song of that syren, till she transforms us into beasts." --Patrick Henry

Freedom & Liberty

   In America three words standout in difference between each other, “Freedom”, “Liberty” and “rights”. This is no small matter as they apply to every individual that makes up our society. The more people having differing views of these words the more we disenfranchise each others place in our society.

   “RIGHTS”; Are prerequisite to our birth as humans and no authority created by man in this world, has the “RIGHT” to diminish or enhance them as they apply only to individuals, not! groups in society.

   “FREEDOM”; Equates as to its opposite “slavery”, where others assume the civil power do dictate every aspect of you individual life in society and you have no say in the matter other than your human right to rebel against them, you may lose, or you may gain your freedom but the question remains at what cost to you, asserting your right to rebel.

Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed---declaration of independence

   “LIBERTY”; is the civil authority allowing unencumbered exercise of individual freedom within the confines of society. Example; when the emancipation of slaves in America took place it gave freedom to the slaves but didn’t mandate it’s co-partner “liberty” and when we finally did enforce liberty it was called group civil rights which is not compatible with our Constitutional system of government which is founded on liberty of individuals not groups!

   Our failure to educate our own people as to the supremacy of our Constitution and the men, who so painstakingly crafted it, was and still is the only thing that has the capacity to destroy our way of life which will set all mankind on a collision course with the past failures of man.  GAP      

 "Without wishing to damp the ardor of curiosity or influence the freedom of inquiry, I will hazard a prediction that, after the most industrious and impartial researchers, the longest liver of you all will find no principles, institutions or systems of education more fit in general to be transmitted to your posterity than those you have received from your ancestors." --John Adams, letter to the young men of the Philadelphia, 7 May 1798

Of the people, by the people, for the people!!

  Abraham Lincoln expressed with words the sum-total of the principles of Americans’ Constitutional government with; “of the people, by the people, for the people” within his Gettysburg address. His summary to Americas’ future has been forever after parsed and twisted by every succeeding generation, which has rendered it meaningless in present day America. Only the few enlightened citizens understood it, while at the same time everyone that heard or read the Gettysburg address knew it meant something most profound.

  Please allow me to explain; when the founders crafted our Constitution, the words they used could not be used to explain the intention (intent) behind their express usage without turning the document itself into a long story of explanations. That is why many of the founders wrote and spoke extensively before, during and after crafting the Constitution in order to explain in long form the intent behind every aspect of it, thus the document was the law of the land, not the explanations or intent for those laws, those can only be found in the writings and words of the founders themselves.

  To assist in explanation lets look at the words “regulate interstate commerce” within the context of the Constitution, commerce means; “business traffic”. It does not mean the business itself only the interstate trade and traffic of that business. The word commerce has been twisted to mean regulating the business, including the process of manufacture and/or the services of the business. When one reads what the founders had to say and why that clause was included, its intent becomes clear. It was put into the Constitution to prevent any one State from taking unjust advantage of any other State because of any factors not available to them like a sea port or mfg. base verses farming.

  Example; if you lived in a State that had oil resources, you could not charge the citizens of other states more for your oil than you charge the citizens of your own state, cost of transport excluded of course. Thus the commerce clause does not give the federal government absolute authority over how, what, where, when and why of any of the peoples business without showing just interstate cause for such intrusion of federal authority, and the federal government would otherwise be impudent as to the peoples business. While I’m at it I might also say that a State to tell a business in their State, like an insurance company, they cannot sell that insurance in any other State is likewise unconstitutional as a condition to operate within it. In the plain language of Lincoln, it’s all about of, by and for the people not of, by and for Government State or federal.

  The final part of understanding Lincoln's of, by and for the people is this; American government was intended to never compete civilly with any private business period and to do civilly only that, that the people could not to for themselves, not those things the people didn't want to do, but just couldn't do . That included even police, fire, parks & recreation, water, electric etc. only the military was exclusive along with weights &; measures and coinage post offices and roads, the courts etc. all else was to be of the people, by the people, for the people.  GAP 

Human Nature an Overview

Once you’re in the forest you can no longer see the forest because of all the trees, which in reality means the closer you get, the less ability you have to take in the overall picture. This is the proposition contained here which is to step back away from things in order to get the whole picture or in other words take a less subjective view in favor of a more objective view.
The founders of America had a more thorough view of human nature and understanding over the whole spectrum, than Jesus Christ himself, because of a larger view over the entire world of mankind’s experienced history. This broader view of human nature was the primary guiding factor in the development of our Constitution. This is why our unique guiding documents as a society have made such a marked impact on the entire world over the last 230 + years. At no time in the entire history of man has reason prevailed over human nature to enlighten mankind than during the founding period in America. Reason, had risen to the top and accordingly human nature must bring it down. There is no alternative to fully reasoned human pursuits!
Human nature follows a set pattern of behavior and one of those patterns is to bring down that or who and what is at the top level of any and all human endeavors. The mighty or successful must always fall syndrome regardless of reason, simply because they or it are at the top. Barnum was correct about human nature when he said there’s a sucker born every minute and that sucker is born of our human nature. The enlighten way of true human progress is not to bring down the top levels of human endeavors at any given time, but through reason to exceed them thus rendering them down, thus making a new top level, that’s true progress.
Within a truly free society of man; all men/women as individuals are with equality under the laws not equality of their conditions. The individual that is a freeloader on any society only drags that society down as whole. It is to those according to their ability regardless of wants or needs. And it is always through the coercive collective and conspiratorial power of divisive groups that have historically destroyed many civilizations good or bad from within. As individuals we have freedom of association which means the individual has the right not to associate with those they chose for any reason, and we cannot legally have an association imposed upon us by law. The preeminence of the individual is always paramount without which freedom and liberty are curtailed.
Human nature has a benevolent side as well as the socially sinister side and within any free society that benevolence will always fall on those with needs that they cannot or will not provide for themselves, and should never rise to the level of legal rights which are ripe for abuse by the sinister side of our human nature.
When ever an organized group or business becomes so large that if it collapsed it would impose a huge burden on the whole of a society it must be broken up into its continuant parts, that includes the government bureaucracy so as to minimize the impact of its failure on the whole of society. No part, private or governmental should ever be allowed to become too big to fail. This principal was touched on in the Constitution in several ways one was the separation of powers the others were in regards to the number of constituents represented by a single Congressman and the representation of a state entity by a single Senator. No single individual is capable of faithfully representing millions of individuals to a governing body.
Today a return to those enlightened constitutional principals would go a long way toward recovering the sick society we Americans suffer within, wrecked by our own human nature!

On Constitutional fidelity #1

   The founding fathers knew that when it came to representatives that no one man/woman could represent with equal justice beyond a certain number that they fixed at thirty thousand in article I of the Constitution. Today that number has been increased unconstitutionally to 600,000. The congress does not have the authority short of a constitutional amendment to change the number of constituents in congressional districts. And even if done by the amendment process it would constitute usurpation (change) not an amendment. The net effect is to weaken the influence on our governmental representatives of each citizen by 2000%.

   Considering the technical advances in transportation and communications changing (usurpation) of the number originally written into law, would and should be seen as justified, but not by that large of percentage increase.

   The fewer congressional seats makes for easier influence and control of our overall house of representatives by a cabal, like unelected members of political parties or other collectives like unions and ethnicity pimps.

   Gerrymandering of the shape of congressional districts to favor one group or another is not constitutional; they should be done by a grid to near equality of citizens (ethnicity or social status or condition not applicable) not populace which counts non-citizens also.

   Comprehensive laws are not in accordance w/ constitutional intent, where all laws and regulations was to be clear and unambiguous in its intent and able to be understood by ordinary men/women without the need of legal counsel to interpret them. (Or write them for that matter)

   All of the points made here, “are” or have been fundamental changes of American government, and no where does the Constitution give any authority to elected officials of government to make fundamental changes to our American form of government.  

   Also the States would be constitutionally wise if they limited population of large cities by creating city districts with separated political powers (Mayors, councils etc.) just like breaking up large corps to eliminate the to big to fail syndrome getting rid of the so called boroughs, like the five boroughs of New York city would then become five separate cities.

GAP

The Constitution Defined

   Ask yourself this question; who better to define in detail an object or work than the creator or creators of it? Yet every generation of man thinks he is smarter and has arrived at a higher intellectual plane, and knows better than those who preceded them. When in self-evident truth those in the present can know thru documented history of events but cannot understand them, so we imagine, based on faulty and fragmented data to arrive at a resolve of cause and effect even to the degree we think we understand the thoughts of our predecessors. In plain language we know of events from the past but they do not add to our individual understanding in the present, so we make it up and quite extreme in many instances and the more distant in the past the more we mystify it, that’s how myths are born.

   The Constitution was designed as a limiting document on government, and the people that are within it. It was written in plain English and needs no interpretation. And to top it off, if by chance there is a question or doubt of any particular part, the founders, the very men that created it, gave us in their own individual writings specific detailed definition and explanation to every part and parcel of it without contradiction, more so than the disciples writings of Christ’s words and actions.

   This leaves all decisions regarding American law strictly held to the standards set forth as uniquely American and exclusionary of all other world bodies of authority. No treaty, agreement, or otherwise commitment by the officials of the United States holds the force of law within our sovereign boundaries outside the strictest adherence of our Constitution.

   There is no left or right of the Constitution, only left or right in the minds of politicians or individual groups, with no legal way to apply them without violating the basic laws laid down within it. This is why socialism or any and all form of collective groups within American society has no legal standing; they are all outside American law. This is if we intend to maintain fidelity to our founding as the most unique Nation to grace the face of this earth.

GAP                 

Reconciled

                            The key to Americas’ future is Americas’ past, reconciled!

 America is the only country on earth where politics is inseparable from civil and social life they are one and the same by law. Where there cannot be a political and a separate civil/social existence for any single individual. The only separate individual status that exists is “political” or “private” under our founding principals.

  We don’t have politicians and civilians we as citizens are all politicians’ and vice/versa, the less we understand that the more we become alienated from one another like foreigners’.

   It is not within the powers of our human nature to live in harmony with our enemies’ side by side in social intercourse without constant clashes with those who wish us ill.

   Our system of governance is not mineable to any other political system and our political development must always remain within the boundaries set forth or break apart. But by breaking apart we are no longer America but lost in the jungle of the savage human nature that dominates all other nations on earth, and that always places the individual in direct servitude to others as apposed to serving our fellow man by first serving ourselves which is the way of our history and it has been shown by it, to the benefit of all others over this earth..

   When out of personal and/or individual necessity one person develops a better mouse trap, does that not benefit all men? Such was the thinking of Benjamin Franklin and his lighting rod and we must be able to reconcile his wisdom with the people of the present.

   Men/women who don’t think in terms of what is in there own best interest don’t think at all they simple react subjectively like all of the lower forms of life on earth.

   Americans of the past always had the mental attitude in life that says “damn the torpedoes full speed ahead”  but this attitude is not strictly held because we are Americans, but that here in America there were a lot less torpedoes than in other countries interfering with the ingenuity of man through collective servitude.

   If and when Americans seek to reconcile our thinking with the men and women of our earliest history and founding we will once again say “damn the torpedoes full speed ahead”

GAP                                    

Smart Vs Intelligent

   Consider this self analysis; are you smart or are you intelligent? Only you can draw that conclusion as a self judgment, and it can only be conclusively understood if you can separate you’re ego from your self deliberations.

   All the so called experts actually think they can tell the difference and even measure your IQ, or make no distinction between the two terms (Smart, Intelligent) which by any intelligent analysis is “neither” it’s just plain ignorant.

   Every average person is smart, the degree of which can be tested by the amount of things you have knowledge of or about, but can only be tested by what is considered normal everyday knowledge, where “you” may have extensive knowledge out side the norm, otherwise one would have to take 100s of specially focused tests. which means, you are your own best judge of your own quantity of knowledge.

   Intelligence is a whole different ball of wax because everyone has intelligence which is not knowledge but the application of and internal analysis of, the knowledge you have acquired at any given point in your life. The recalling of the knowledge you have is not intelligence, which is just regurgitation of data, intelligence is in the developed talent of processes and analysis, on the sum of that knowledge.

   The more knowledge you have the better and more reliable you’re intelligence you can be, but this is the catch, you may have never learned how to analyze your own knowledge in order to draw an intelligent conclusion, and all you can do is spout data minus intelligent analysis of it. (For practical proposes called “thought”) the thoughtless expressions of knowledge are not intelligent thought. Like; you can baffle others with knowledge, but you can enlighten them with your intelligence.

   All this is what is popularly known as critical thinking which most people only use at work that requires it, seldom in their day to day lives and those who take no responsibility to themselves and theirs don’t use critical thinking at all, while understanding is the sum of intelligence.  

   The best measure I know of to measure the intelligence used by others is by testing their egos the more egotistical the less intelligent the individual. Way too many graduates from our schools have egos to match the dollars spent to educate them need I say more.

   Well I will; intelligence does not just happen it has to be used and used often, practice does make one more intellectual but to brag on it only makes one ignorant and egotistical. Oh, and a true intellectual is not afraid to publicly admit when he/she doesn’t know of or about something but is eager to learn more about it always.

 GAP 

Re-establishment of Justice

  No matter the number of laws created; without uniform nonbiased enforcement the entire legal system is a charade at the mercy of the very human nature it is intended to control. (In Government)

  The entire enforcement arms of our justice system should be placed under the control of the chief justice of the Supreme Court with oversight authority by the House of Representatives except in cases involving its own members. This refocus of justice on the political rather than the general body of citizens was the intent of the people regarding their sovereignty from the abuses of government incased in our original constitution.

   The character of our society (The people) establishes the moral, social and civil justice outside the manipulation of government political theorists’ and within the laws of conscience. The people are capable of self governance without interference from elitists social or political, but become helpless under their thumbs and unconstitutional laws.

   The preceding is exactly what the founders intended as amendments, as apposed to the gaming of our Constitution which is what we have been doing to our basic system of self governance since day one.

   Every instance in our history that one can recall that was harmful to us as a society and as a nation was initiated thru the auspices of government officials, without a legal enforcement arm to keep them honest, because they controlled that arm making justice in America a world wide joke. (Politicians)

  The Congress of the United States of America was delegated the authority to make laws not to govern, the president was to govern the federal governments responsibilities’ not make laws, but within the laws, and the judiciary was to keep them in line with the laws and the Constitution, the basic laws. The following bureaucracy was to act as servants to those same ends.

  True justice for the people in America will never prevail if all power of enforcement is in the hands of the human nature of elected officials.

GAP

Fidelity

   If you are an American citizen by birth or naturalized, you have an obligation of fidelity to the Constitution, the country that it represents, to the founders and every man and women that has sacrificed for it in our history. It is not a matter of individual choice! You are free to disagree with many things in America, but you cannot disagree and or appose this obligation of fidelity and remain among the faithful without incurring our righteous wrath.

   If you deny you’re obligations, that is infidelity which makes you and infidel. As an infidel you are not an American or a patriot you are like a weed in America’s garden, and when the weeds get out of control you will be pulled out by your roots and left to dry up in the sunshine of our liberty.

   Today in America we have been over crowded with infidel weeds that are threatening to choke out the very fruit of our liberties and it is incumbent on all patriots to get to work weeding, starting with the weeds in our government before we have to burn and lay waste to our own crops in order to replenish the land.

   It’s not like we haven’t had to do this before and it’s the least desirable and most terrible resolve we can draw when our own demise as a nation is at stake, but let the infidel’s know now that unless they have a metamorphosis there are no limits we will not go to sustain our fidelity to America.

GAP

Mole Hills into Mountains

   Molehills into mountains; that phrase reflects the primary pettiness of American society today. We don’t listen to each other anymore, we listen for molehills that we can make into mountains and gulfs between us, much of it imaginative conjured up from the depths of our own depravity, like we actually think we know what someone else is really thinking. We then use that as the molehill to create the mountain.

   Could it be that this is because we are so phony that we see everyone else as a refection of ourselves, as it refers to our own ulterior motives in everything we say and do? If a man gives a compliment does that mean he has some ulterior motive behind it? If a man says he apposes illegal immigration does that automatically mean he dislikes the ethnicity of the immigrant? If a man uses the word black in regards to another person is that just stating a fact or expressing some prejudice? Is not white, black, yellow or brown part of the visual profile that all humans share and recognize?     

    America was not founded as a black and white society yet over the years is what we have constantly tried to make her. Our purpose from our founding on was to repudiate that world wide separation of people within our society as the opposite from the rest of the world’s cultures. As a nation we expressed our sincerity to accomplish that human goal with the sacrifice of over 600,000 citizens. We were not just fighting the southern states but the intrinsic nature of mankind to physically dominate over his fellow man.

   From time immortal mankind has sought to bring individuals into a collective, if not by choice then by force, that is and was the birth of human slavery. It was the stronger subjecting the weaker, might make’s right as it were.

   All of this human capacity for power over others was what America was to overcome in the minds and hearts of our forefathers. But this is in our nature and until man can individually rule over his own human nature the capacity to dominate others with a slave master mentality we shall never move forward as a species.

   No other place on earth but America is the potential to be enlightened to the truth of the individuality of men/women but we cannot get there through the retrograde of the social collectives and absolutely not through the coercive power of a government collective.

   Every American when push comes to shove sees him/herself as an individual first and foremost with associations or connections to others, but will always separate from them if they become possessive with demands from a collective view. This holds true wither it be family, ethnicity, gender or religious beliefs. The only rare exception is nationality.

   Over the years from the birth of America as a nation and as it grew and expanded and become so diverse many have lost sight of Americas purpose and history and as their human nature became the guiding influence which causes them not to think of themselves as Americans but revert to all the very things that drove our forefathers to reject, and then create this nation in the first place. Even though a person may reside in America no longer means they are American but retrograde Americans.

   It all boils down to a state of mind and we must assimilate those in retrograde status and in a mini-collective state of mind or expel them we cannot coexist and still remain America. Americans are individually but one and the same.

GAP     

Believe it, Love it, Live it

   Defining the modern liberal bent or their general social conduct after 70+ years of analysis and as accurately as possible, leads one ultimately too the animal level of thought or thinking, they function psychologically like mal- adjusted domesticated dogs that bite the hand that feeds and cares for them and would sooner attack their owner than a home intruder. They crap where they live and eat, hump your leg, then piss on it, and act like they are in charge of everyone around them, like an alpha dog. When turned loose on society they pack-up like all pack animals limited in size only by the alpha dog leaders of their packs. Each pack will viciously attack in the most personal and life threatening way, anyone or other pack without remorse, when they find themselves at cross purpose to each other. They will chew off there own leg when caught in a trap too only be destroyed by the rest of the pack due to their physical handicap or perceived weakness. They are firm believers of the coercive social commune by the tyranny of the pack as much so as all the human barbarians’ and savages of history where the “individual” is an expendable commodity of the group or pack.

                                                     Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. (Declaration of independence)

   Representatives of congress and the senate where specifically to represent their constituency within the limits set by the Constitution not their own political interests within the governmental elite.

  The parties that form in the private sector to encourage voters to pick these representatives or another have no official place or authority in the governance of a free people. Their party platforms are not substitutes for the Constitution.

   The press although mentioned in the constitution as to be free from government, does not give it an official or legal roll in governance, the same for religions.

   The congress has the constitutional authority to set its own rules but that does not include extra constitutional rules such as forming caucuses or cabals that have the right to exclude any other elected member who wishes to participate only equal representation of their constituents is constitutional. Nor should political parties hold any official place of authority within governance, the people don’t elect parties we elect representatives. And gerrymandering of districts based on any thing but geography to achieve some perceived parity is also unconstitutional. Segregation or integration by individual choice is freedom, segregation or integration by law is unconstitutional that’s all gerrymandering does. Every law created that is not in accordance with the Constitution is null and void even if the Supreme Court says otherwise.

   All of the above is the truth of the corruption that prevails in the American government today.  

   Even the people who elect a person to a government position like an avowed Socialist, Marxist, Islamism, Anarchists etc. cannot expect to legally change our Constitution and or laws outside of it and any attempt to do just that is unconstitutional and will result in only one way, Revolution!

 GAP