tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15010910423280068262024-03-08T07:18:31.074-06:00Sovereign Citizen"Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind. With such persons, gullibility, which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason and the mind becomes a wreck." --Thomas Jeffersonpubliushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.comBlogger128125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-61500593785555448872013-03-14T12:04:00.001-05:002013-03-25T00:33:17.894-05:00Freedom; what it is, and what it is not.<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size: 16.0pt;"> </span><span style="line-height: 200%;"> Unadulterated freedom is an unattainable goal; that is what the founders
of </span><st1:place style="line-height: 200%;" w:st="on">America</st1:place><span style="line-height: 200%;">
knew and understood, which was their impetus behind the documents that
established our great nation. They also knew that one of the primary driving
forces in human nature is the unconscious desire to be truly free. This meant
to them that mankind if totally left completely unrestricted would pursue all
things in life without any awareness or acknowledgement of the consequences of
his/her own actions leaving only the individual conscience if they had one as a
control on behavior. This would not bode well in the development of a great
society. Yet the founders of </span><st1:place style="line-height: 200%;" w:st="on">America</st1:place><span style="line-height: 200%;">
chose to allow men/women as much liberty as could be, with minimum impact on
the freedom or liberties of others.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
In this light the government at all levels has lost sight by the
introduction of laws that changes us from the freest nation on earth into a
nation of serfs. This raises the question about the purpose or value of laws
beyond those set forth in our founding.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
A law does not make a person behave in any specific way; it only
represents a threat of reprisal and cannot stop a free person from taking the
liberty to violate it. The sum of more laws only means more punishments and
imprisonment to be carried-out by the government on the free people of our
nation. Our laws should be more like; “don’t sweat the small violations and all
violations are small”. Did or have you ever considered why the founders didn’t
create a civil or federal police force and left policing if necessary to we the
people. That as we as a nation grew we didn’t create law enforcement agencies
we created police agencies for the purpose of keeping the peace, not enforcing
the laws but to protect us from violence and crime and investigation, where law
enforcement was strictly the purview of the legal system and the courts. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
Today our government has changed policing into surveillance of
everything we do, and call it law enforcement that’s what is called a “police
state” which no longer allows the liberty of being free people.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
I view myself as a free person and if someone or group approaches me in an
aggressive manner and worse yet is armed I will perceive it as a threat and
will aggressively defend myself, and a uniform or badge is not a permission
slip for such behavior. GAP</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
P.S. <st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region> is a nation that desperately
needs to be reset and rebooted.</div>
publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-72460776157284907952012-12-20T20:22:00.002-06:002012-12-20T20:24:33.568-06:00<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
What young or otherwise modern man can read the following wisdom from these great men, white or otherwise and conclude they know better or some how human nature has changed over time which would render them old and inapplicable to modern times. I would say only fools and imbeciles! GAP </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Just sampling;</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"As
our president bears no resemblance to a king so we shall see the Senate has no
similitude to nobles. First, not being hereditary, their collective knowledge,
wisdom, and virtue are not precarious. For by these qualities alone are they to
obtain their offices, and they will have none of the peculiar qualities and
vices of those men who possess power merely because their father held it before
them." --Tench Coxe, An American Citizen, No. 2, 1787</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"The
foundation of national morality must be laid in private families." --John
Adams</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"Those
who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the
fatigues of supporting it." --Thomas Paine, The Crisis, no. 4, 1777</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"Law
and liberty cannot rationally become the objects of our love, unless they first
become the objects of our knowledge." --James Wilson, Of the Study of the
Law in the <st1:place w:st="on">United States</st1:place>,
1790</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"Laws
that forbid the carrying of arms ... disarm only those who are neither inclined
nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the
assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to
prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence
than an armed man." --Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishment, quoted by
Thomas Jefferson in Commonplace Book</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"All,
too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the
majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be
reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must
protect, and to violate would be oppression." --Thomas Jefferson, First
Inaugural Address, 1801</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"Before
a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost
every kingdom of <st1:place w:st="on">Europe</st1:place>. The supreme power in <st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region> cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword;
because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior
to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense raised in the <st1:place w:st="on">United States</st1:place>."
--Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal
Constitution, 1787</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"The
latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man." --James
Madison</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"There
is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it
steadily." --George Washington</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"For
my part, whatever anguish of spirit it might cost, I am willing to know the
whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." --Patrick Henry</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"If
men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any
essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of
society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation; the right to freedom being
the gift of God Almighty, it is not in the power of Man to alienate this gift,
and voluntarily become a slave." --John Adams, Rights of the Colonists,
1772</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"It
is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by
itself." --Thomas Jefferson</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"A
just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which
unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species."
--James Madison, Essay on Property, 1792</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has
justly been considered as the palladium of the liberties of a republic."
--Joseph Story</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-91381223300703377132012-08-14T07:25:00.000-05:002012-08-14T07:25:06.122-05:00<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<b><span style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 200%;"> What the Tea Party is all about<o:p></o:p></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<b><span style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 200%;"> The following immortal words expressed for
all time by Samuel Adams is why the Tea Party movement exists. It’s to confront
those liberals, communists, Islamists and all those that support them that have
in concert and with malice of forethought thru the auspices of the democrat
party, infiltrated all ranks of our American government and are expressly in
the process of fundamentally changing the long standing relationship between “We
The People” and our government (Our Constitution) that our forefathers
sacrificed so much for lest it all have been in vain. GAP <o:p></o:p></span></b></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<b>"Contemplate the mangled bodies of your
countrymen, and then say, 'What should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid
us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, and plough, and
sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs
of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth
better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of
freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and
lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may
posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" --Samuel Adams</b><o:p></o:p></div>
publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-85069188856598567432012-06-14T09:44:00.001-05:002012-06-14T09:44:19.370-05:00<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
We Americans have become so comfortable in our wallows we can no longer see
the treachery within our gates of freedom. We have been infiltrated by the
worst of the worst yet we still beg tolerance and patience of those who are
fully aware, while the American dream; and the city upon the hill are coming
down upon us. We as a nation of free men and women are being dismantled by both
foreign and domestic interlopers from within. It is almost with glee that we
not only watch, but encourage our own demise. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
We no longer need to wonder or
question why and how a single man speaking gibberish can mesmerize an entire
nation such as Germany, and no one tried to stop it. For we are in the early
stages of the identical process by which they succumbed to Hitler’s’ rants, and
like him; tears apart original and long establish laws and puts himself and his
crazy ideas above the welfare of his nation, until its total destruction. We
think we are immune from the same fate but human nature is about to send not
only we Americans, but the entire world back into the dark ages of human
history. The point of no return is in view, all we have to do is open our minds
eyes. The mind truly is a terrible thing to waste. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
Back in the 1950s on the TV show bandstand, the host of the show
traditionally would ask the kids in the audience what it was about a particular
new song they liked, the standard clique as a response was “aaah I like the
rhythm” it was usually a lousy song but performed by someone they liked. I fear
that is how we are responding to our new president’s song and dance, “aaaah we
just like the rhythm”. Who says history doesn’t repeat itself? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
Benjamin Franklin said it best with brevity, when he said; “Here comes
the orator with his flood of words and drop of reason”.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
And from me G.A.P.; As a Nation made
up of free and sovereign citizens diversity in the objects of our industries is
our strength, diversity of our purpose is our weakness. </div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-86524079012391006282012-05-28T15:59:00.001-05:002012-05-29T14:52:08.761-05:00<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
Community organizer my ass </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
“Community organizing” is an American tradition carried forward from our
very beginnings that has been bastardized over time by Communism. Today’s communities
throughout <st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place>
have very little to no Idea of the true American nature of “Community organizing”
verses what the likes of socialists/communists call it.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
Our Constitution was designed with the idea and principals that government
was not to get involved with the various communities until the problems of any
given community were beyond the scope of what the community it’s self could do
in it’s own self interests and even then it had no right or power to impose it’s
self, but only then by request from the community and deemed to be equal and necessary
to the entire State of various communities.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
Everything from public safety to sanitation fell under the responsibility
of local communities to provide for themselves the degree to which they
themselves felt necessary. That is where “Community organizing came into its
own. From organizing policing, jails, fire protection, sanitation, barn raisings,
posses, schools, churches, Water co-ops and many other such co-ops designed by,
for and of its own capacity. Each community contributed to the state where the
state would assist other communities in there individual efforts of development
mostly to provide community organizing but again not to impose standards beyond
the established communities minimums.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
In <st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region>
community organizing is as natural a thing to do as eating and there are always
members in every community who will willingly take it on in the interest of the
community in which they themselves live.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
All I have said here is American historical fact but the one thing
community organizing is not is collectively getting together to coerce
different levels of government to politically help the community or portions of
it with money or other aid from other Americans transferred into your community
that is socialism/communism. “community organizing’ is simply organizing the
community on how to help itself, not steal from others.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 150%;">
The bottom line is this; Obama was not and is not a community organizer
in an American sense he is a community organizer in a communist way of
development only. If your community cannot do it for it’s self it doesn’t need
it, it just wants a handout.<br />
GAP</div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-88415191734457732242012-05-05T09:04:00.002-05:002012-05-05T09:04:11.902-05:00<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
Bulimia, anorexia, schizophrenia, psychopathic behavior, liberalism,
religions etc, are in fact SD’s (social diseases) imposed on individuals in any
given society by purposely created propaganda. The purpose behind them all is
aimed at “power and control” over entire cultures. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
Avoidance of in-depth reasoning by the individual and left to the “experts”
also known as the so-called educated elites of a society, where the “propaganda”;
is that which is meant to convince every one of that which is false or unknown
as truth, which it is not.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
Truth is self-evident where no argument can repudiate and disbelief is
not a valid argument no matter name calling and cursing. GAP</div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-76070852141108660842012-05-04T12:00:00.001-05:002012-05-04T12:00:23.527-05:00<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
As an American citizen I am an
individual sovereign, where ever I am there is a zone of my sovereignty that
exists (what ever is within my field of awareness) all that occurs within this
zone is of my concern and is subject to my sovereign authority first and
foremost. <o:p></o:p></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-72389796252504436412011-07-20T13:16:00.002-05:002011-07-20T13:17:06.729-05:00Sacred Honor<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>Years ago in my youth while reading the Declaration of Independence the
last two words “Sacred Honor” jumped out at me like a lightening bolt and why
would the founders of <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>,
place that on an equal footing of importance with their very lives and fortunes.
It was at that time certain that I realized I didn’t know what they meant, nor
if I even possessed such a thing as my own sacred honor and how and where does
one acquire such a personally valued thing. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>I set out on a quest to see if others questioned could explain what
sacred honor meant to them and if they understood it in the same way, with the
same degree of importance as our founders did. What I got was almost as varied
as snow flakes from those I questioned. From some with strong religious faith,
it was meant the same as the swearing of “so help me God’ in a court of law or
pledge while still others thought of it as the honor of trust or responsibility
bestowed on them by overall society that they viewed as sacred.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>As I grew older I became convinced that they were talking about truth,
honesty and commitment not so much as it related to overall society but to ones
own accumulated over time, “objective convictions” regarding their own
individual selves. (Being true to ones, own self) living up to their own
personal standards as established over time, completely absent what might be
called self deceit. This I concluded by reading their own personal writings.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>The difference between public and personal where the personal was of
paramount value that was not necessarily in tandem with public perceptions like
the difference between a patriot or sunshine patriot that is the sacred honor
they placed on par with life and/or fortune which can only be found within. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">
<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">
</span>Woe be-it onto the Americans of today that have no Sacred Honor on par
with our founding fathers, but wallow only in the perceptions of and self
deceit of faux public honors. GAP <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>
<br />publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-73089134836353940652011-06-05T13:57:00.001-05:002011-06-06T17:12:47.335-05:00The Hallmark of Freedom is Liberty<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"> <br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">What’s all the current political controversy in America among the average citizens all about some may ask, while others say, Democrats, Republicans, the rich, the poor, jobs, spending, immigration, wars, Islam, corruption, rights, etc.. But all those things are but smoke clouding the minds of both those that consider themselves; as liberal or conservative and they both view themselves as Patriots.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Like the old adage from the railroad industry “stop, look, listen” modern Americans have discarded the reason behind the words, while remembering the words only as old hat that does not apply anymore because we modern men/women are intellectually beyond such admonitions.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Black Americans today equate slavery as the opposite of freedom, yet when given freedom without the liberty to individually exercise that freedom held them under the thumb and whims of the political élites, and all the rest of <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> has adopted the same point of view. It is not the words that matter but the true historical meaning and understanding of them when we use them.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Anarchy benefits only the physically strong or those that can amass power through the collective. The collective benefits only those that rank among the elite, on the backs of the majority.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In the lead up to <st1:country-region w:st="on">America's</st1:country-region> original revolution; the call from the overwhelming majority was not for freedom from <st1:country-region w:st="on">Great Britain</st1:country-region>; it was for “<st1:city w:st="on">LIBERTY</st1:city>” we were already free, but freedom without liberty from the controlling civil authority, means only limited slavery as apposed to full fledged slavery like that imposed on most of <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America's</st1:place></st1:country-region> blacks at the time. Individual liberty was at the very root purpose of our Constitution by limiting government as to its power to curtail or restrict our liberty to exercise our rights and freedoms given not by government but by our creator.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In today’s modern <st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region> the same issue of “<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">LIBERTY</st1:city></st1:place>” is the motivating factor behind the so called TEA PARTY movement even though many among them don’t realize it and focus on the smoke.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."--Patrick Henry, speech in the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:state w:st="on">Virginia</st1:state></st1:place> Ratifying Convention, 5 June 1778</b></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 200%;">"It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth -- and listen to the song of that syren, till she transforms us into beasts." --Patrick Henry</span></b></div><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"></span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-74874777364029435592011-05-09T16:35:00.002-05:002011-05-09T16:35:35.051-05:00Freedom & Liberty<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In <st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region> three words standout in difference between each other, “Freedom”, “<st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Liberty</st1:place></st1:city>” and “rights”. This is no small matter as they apply to every individual that makes up our society. The more people having differing views of these words the more we disenfranchise each others place in our society.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>“RIGHTS”; Are prerequisite to our birth as humans and no authority created by man in this world, has the “RIGHT” to diminish or enhance them as they apply only to individuals, not! groups in society.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>“FREEDOM”; Equates as to its opposite “slavery”, where others assume the civil power do dictate every aspect of you individual life in society and you have no say in the matter other than your human right to rebel against them, you may lose, or you may gain your freedom but the question remains at what cost to you, asserting your right to rebel.</div><div class="MsoNormal">Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed---declaration of independence</div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>“<st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">LIBERTY</st1:place></st1:city>”; is the civil authority allowing unencumbered exercise of individual freedom within the confines of society. Example; when the emancipation of slaves in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place> took place it gave freedom to the slaves but didn’t mandate it’s co-partner “liberty” and when we finally did enforce liberty it was called group civil rights which is not compatible with our Constitutional system of government which is founded on liberty of individuals not groups!</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Our failure to educate our own people as to the supremacy of our Constitution and the men, who so painstakingly crafted it, was and still is the only thing that has the capacity to destroy our way of life which will set all mankind on a collision course with the past failures of man.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 200%;">"Without wishing to damp the ardor of curiosity or influence the freedom of inquiry, I will hazard a prediction that, after the most industrious and impartial researchers, the longest liver of you all will find no principles, institutions or systems of education more fit in general to be transmitted to your posterity than those you have received from your ancestors." --John Adams, letter to the young men of the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Philadelphia</st1:city></st1:place>, 7 May 1798</span></b></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-68730577820979869662011-04-21T16:25:00.001-05:002011-04-26T15:22:56.145-05:00Of the people, by the people, for the people!!<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Abraham Lincoln expressed with words the <u>sum-total</u> of the principles of Americans’ Constitutional government with; “of the people, by the people, for the people” within his <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Gettysburg</st1:place></st1:city> address. His summary to <st1:country-region w:st="on">Americas</st1:country-region>’ future has been forever after parsed and twisted by every succeeding generation, which has rendered it meaningless in present day <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>. Only the few <u>enlightened citizens</u> understood it, while at the same time everyone that heard or read the Gettysburg address knew it meant <u>something most profound</u>.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Please allow me to explain; when the founders crafted our Constitution, the words they used could not be used to explain the intention (intent) behind their express usage without turning the document itself into a long story of explanations. That is why many of the founders wrote and spoke extensively before, during and after crafting the Constitution in order to explain in <u>long form</u> the intent behind every aspect of it, thus the document was the law of the land, not the explanations or intent for those laws, those can only be found in the writings and words of the founders themselves.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>To assist in explanation lets look at the words “regulate interstate commerce” within the context of the Constitution, commerce means; “business traffic”. It does not mean the business itself only the interstate trade and traffic of that business. The word commerce has been twisted to mean regulating the business, including the process of manufacture and/or the services of the business. When one reads what the founders had to say and why that clause was included, its intent becomes clear. It was put into the Constitution to prevent any one State from taking unjust advantage of any other State because of any factors not available to them like a sea port or mfg. base verses farming. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Example; if you lived in a State that had oil resources, you could not charge the citizens of other states more for your oil than you charge the citizens of your own state, cost of transport excluded of course. Thus the commerce clause does not give the federal government absolute authority over how, what, where, when and why of any of the peoples business without showing just <u>interstate cause</u> for such intrusion of federal authority, and the federal government would otherwise be impudent as to the peoples business. While I’m at it I might also say that a State to tell a business in their State, like an insurance company, they cannot sell that insurance in any other State is likewise unconstitutional as a condition to operate within it. In the plain language of <st1:city w:st="on">Lincoln</st1:city>, it’s all about of, by and for the people not of, by and for <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">Government</st1:placename> <st1:placetype w:st="on">State</st1:placetype></st1:place> or federal.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The final part of understanding Lincoln's of, by and for the people is this; American government was intended to never compete civilly with any private business period and to do civilly only that, that the people could not to for themselves, not those things the people didn't want to do, but just couldn't do . That included even police, fire, parks & recreation, water, electric etc. only the military was exclusive along with weights &; measures and coinage post offices and roads, the courts etc. all else was to be of the people, by the people, for the people.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-64140714320473934842010-12-18T16:33:00.000-06:002010-12-18T16:33:14.190-06:00Human Nature an OverviewOnce you’re in the forest you can no longer see the forest because of all the trees, which in reality means the closer you get, the less ability you have to take in the overall picture. This is the proposition contained here which is to step back away from things in order to get the whole picture or in other words take a less subjective view in favor of a more objective view. <br />
The founders of America had a more thorough view of human nature and understanding over the whole spectrum, than Jesus Christ himself, because of a larger view over the entire world of mankind’s experienced history. This broader view of human nature was the primary guiding factor in the development of our Constitution. This is why our unique guiding documents as a society have made such a marked impact on the entire world over the last 230 + years. At no time in the entire history of man has reason prevailed over human nature to enlighten mankind than during the founding period in America. Reason, had risen to the top and accordingly human nature must bring it down. There is no alternative to fully reasoned human pursuits! <br />
Human nature follows a set pattern of behavior and one of those patterns is to bring down that or who and what is at the top level of any and all human endeavors. The mighty or successful must always fall syndrome regardless of reason, simply because they or it are at the top. Barnum was correct about human nature when he said there’s a sucker born every minute and that sucker is born of our human nature. The enlighten way of true human progress is not to bring down the top levels of human endeavors at any given time, but through reason to exceed them thus rendering them down, thus making a new top level, that’s true progress. <br />
Within a truly free society of man; all men/women as individuals are with equality under the laws not equality of their conditions. The individual that is a freeloader on any society only drags that society down as whole. It is to those according to their ability regardless of wants or needs. And it is always through the coercive collective and conspiratorial power of divisive groups that have historically destroyed many civilizations good or bad from within. As individuals we have freedom of association which means the individual has the right not to associate with those they chose for any reason, and we cannot legally have an association imposed upon us by law. The preeminence of the individual is always paramount without which freedom and liberty are curtailed. <br />
Human nature has a benevolent side as well as the socially sinister side and within any free society that benevolence will always fall on those with needs that they cannot or will not provide for themselves, and should never rise to the level of legal rights which are ripe for abuse by the sinister side of our human nature. <br />
When ever an organized group or business becomes so large that if it collapsed it would impose a huge burden on the whole of a society it must be broken up into its continuant parts, that includes the government bureaucracy so as to minimize the impact of its failure on the whole of society. No part, private or governmental should ever be allowed to become too big to fail. This principal was touched on in the Constitution in several ways one was the separation of powers the others were in regards to the number of constituents represented by a single Congressman and the representation of a state entity by a single Senator. No single individual is capable of faithfully representing millions of individuals to a governing body.<br />
Today a return to those enlightened constitutional principals would go a long way toward recovering the sick society we Americans suffer within, wrecked by our own human nature!publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-74363112121981209262010-11-24T12:43:00.000-06:002010-11-24T12:43:27.101-06:00On Constitutional fidelity #1<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The founding fathers knew that when it came to representatives that no one man/woman could represent with equal justice beyond a certain number that they fixed at thirty thousand in article I of the Constitution. Today that number has been increased unconstitutionally to 600,000. The congress does not have the authority short of a constitutional amendment to change the number of constituents in congressional districts. And even if done by the amendment process it would constitute usurpation (change) not an amendment. The net effect is to weaken the influence on our governmental representatives of each citizen by 2000%. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Considering the technical advances in transportation and communications changing (usurpation) of the number originally written into law, would and should be seen as justified, but not by that large of percentage increase.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The fewer congressional seats makes for easier influence and control of our overall house of representatives by a cabal, like unelected members of political parties or other collectives like unions and ethnicity pimps.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Gerrymandering of the shape of congressional districts to favor one group or another is not constitutional; they should be done by a grid to near equality of citizens (ethnicity or social status or condition not applicable) not populace which counts non-citizens also.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Comprehensive laws are not in accordance w/ constitutional intent, where all laws and regulations was to be clear and unambiguous in its intent and able to be understood by ordinary men/women without the need of legal counsel to interpret them. (Or write them for that matter)</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All of the points made here, “are” or have been fundamental changes of American government, and no where does the Constitution give any authority to elected officials of government to make fundamental changes to our American form of government. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Also the States would be constitutionally wise if they limited population of large cities by creating city districts with separated political powers (Mayors, councils etc.) just like breaking up large corps to eliminate the to big to fail syndrome getting rid of the so called boroughs, like the five boroughs of New York city would then become five separate cities.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP</div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-60645941477587043432010-11-15T12:21:00.002-06:002010-11-15T12:21:49.803-06:00The Constitution Defined<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Ask yourself this question; who better to define in detail an object or work than the creator or creators of it? Yet every generation of man thinks he is smarter and has arrived at a higher intellectual plane, and knows better than those who preceded them. When in self-evident truth those in the present can know thru documented history of events but cannot understand them, so we imagine, based on faulty and fragmented data to arrive at a resolve of cause and effect even to the degree we think we understand the thoughts of our predecessors. In plain language we know of events from the past but they do not add to our individual understanding in the present, so we make it up and quite extreme in many instances and the more distant in the past the more we mystify it, that’s how myths are born. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The Constitution was designed as a limiting document on government, and the people that are within it. It was written in plain English and needs no interpretation. And to top it off, if by chance there is a question or doubt of any particular part, the founders, the very men that created it, gave us in their own individual writings specific detailed definition and explanation to every part and parcel of it without contradiction, more so than the disciples writings of Christ’s words and actions.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This leaves all decisions regarding American law strictly held to the standards set forth as uniquely American and exclusionary of all other world bodies of authority. No treaty, agreement, or otherwise commitment by the officials of the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">United States</st1:country-region></st1:place> holds the force of law within our sovereign boundaries outside the strictest adherence of our Constitution. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There is no left or right of the Constitution, only left or right in the minds of politicians or individual groups, with no legal way to apply them without violating the basic laws laid down within it. This is why socialism or any and all form of collective groups within American society has no legal standing; they are all outside American law. This is if we intend to maintain fidelity to our founding as the most unique Nation to grace the face of this earth.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-53159463031770450932010-09-07T10:27:00.000-05:002010-09-07T10:27:19.446-05:00Reconciled<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The key to <st1:country-region w:st="on">Americas</st1:country-region>’ future is <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Americas</st1:place></st1:country-region>’ past, reconciled! </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place> is the only country on earth where politics is inseparable from civil and social life they are one and the same by law. Where there cannot be a political and a separate civil/social existence for any single individual. The only separate individual status that exists is “political” or “private” under our founding principals. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We don’t have politicians and civilians we as citizens are all politicians’ and vice/versa, the less we understand that the more we become alienated from one another like foreigners’.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is not within the powers of our human nature to live in harmony with our enemies’ side by side in social intercourse without constant clashes with those who wish us ill.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Our system of governance is not mineable to any other political system and our political development must always remain within the boundaries set forth or break apart. But by breaking apart we are no longer America but lost in the jungle of the savage human nature that dominates all other nations on earth, and that always places the individual in direct servitude to others as apposed to serving our fellow man by first serving ourselves which is the way of our history and it has been shown by it, to the benefit of all others over this earth.. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When out of personal and/or individual necessity one person develops a better mouse trap, does that not benefit all men? Such was the thinking of Benjamin Franklin and his lighting rod and we must be able to reconcile his wisdom with the people of the present. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Men/women who don’t think in terms of what is in there own best interest don’t think at all they simple react subjectively like all of the lower forms of life on earth.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Americans of the past always had the mental attitude in life that says “damn the torpedoes full speed ahead” <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>but this attitude is not strictly held because we are Americans, but that here in America there were a lot less torpedoes than in other countries interfering with the ingenuity of man through collective servitude.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If and when Americans seek to reconcile our thinking with the men and women of our earliest history and founding we will once again say “damn the torpedoes full speed ahead”</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-29588608975032880642010-08-29T17:46:00.001-05:002010-08-29T17:50:25.661-05:00Smart Vs Intelligent<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Consider this self analysis; are you smart or are you intelligent? Only you can draw that conclusion as a self judgment, and it can only be conclusively understood if you can separate you’re ego from your self deliberations. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All the so called experts actually think they can tell the difference and even measure your IQ, or make no distinction between the two terms (Smart, Intelligent) which by any intelligent analysis is “neither” it’s just plain ignorant.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Every average person is smart, the degree of which can be tested by the amount of things you have knowledge of or about, but can only be tested by what is considered normal everyday knowledge, where “you” may have extensive knowledge out side the norm, otherwise one would have to take 100s of specially focused tests. which means, you are your own best judge of your own quantity of knowledge.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Intelligence is a whole different ball of wax because everyone has intelligence which is not knowledge but the application of and internal analysis of, the knowledge you have acquired at any given point in your life. The recalling of the knowledge you have is not intelligence, which is just regurgitation of data, intelligence is in the developed talent of processes and analysis, on the sum of that knowledge. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The more knowledge you have the better and more reliable you’re intelligence you can be, but this is the catch, you may have never learned how to analyze your own knowledge in order to draw an intelligent conclusion, and all you can do is spout data minus intelligent analysis of it. (For practical proposes called “thought”) the thoughtless expressions of knowledge are not intelligent thought. Like; you can baffle others with knowledge, but you can enlighten them with your intelligence. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All this is what is popularly known as critical thinking which most people only use at work that requires it, seldom in their day to day lives and those who take no responsibility to themselves and theirs don’t use critical thinking at all, while understanding is the sum of intelligence. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The best measure I know of to measure the intelligence used by others is by testing their egos the more egotistical the less intelligent the individual. Way too many graduates from our schools have egos to match the dollars spent to educate them need I say more. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"> <br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Well I will; intelligence does not just happen it has to be used and used often, practice does make one more intellectual but to brag on it only makes one ignorant and egotistical. Oh, and a true intellectual is not afraid to publicly admit when he/she doesn’t know of or about something but is eager to learn more about it always.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-67168045026667227872010-08-21T20:22:00.000-05:002010-08-21T20:22:03.259-05:00Re-establishment of Justice<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>No matter the number of laws created; without uniform nonbiased enforcement the entire legal system is a charade at the mercy of the very human nature it is intended to control. (In Government) </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The entire enforcement arms of our justice system should be placed under the control of the chief justice of the Supreme Court with oversight authority by the House of Representatives except in cases involving its own members. This refocus of justice on the political rather than the general body of citizens was the intent of the people regarding their sovereignty from the abuses of government incased in our original constitution. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The character of our society (The people) establishes the moral, social and civil justice outside the manipulation of government political theorists’ and within the laws of conscience. The people are capable of self governance without interference from elitists social or political, but become helpless under their thumbs and unconstitutional laws.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The preceding is exactly what the founders intended as amendments, as apposed to the gaming of our Constitution which is what we have been doing to our basic system of self governance since day one.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Every instance in our history that one can recall that was harmful to us as a society and as a nation was initiated thru the auspices of government officials, without a legal enforcement arm to keep them honest, because they controlled that arm making justice in America a world wide joke. (Politicians) </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The Congress of the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">United States of America</st1:place></st1:country-region> was delegated the authority to make laws not to govern, the president was to govern the federal governments responsibilities’ not make laws, but within the laws, and the judiciary was to keep them in line with the laws and the Constitution, the basic laws. The following bureaucracy was to act as servants to those same ends.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>True justice for the people in America will never prevail if all power of enforcement is in the hands of the human nature of elected officials.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP</div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-38817154066688444612010-08-15T14:32:00.002-05:002010-08-15T14:32:19.437-05:00Fidelity<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If you are an American citizen by birth or naturalized, you have an obligation of fidelity to the Constitution, the country that it represents, to the founders and every man and women that has sacrificed for it in our history. It is not a matter of individual choice! You are free to disagree with many things in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>, but you cannot disagree and or appose this obligation of fidelity and remain among the faithful without incurring our righteous wrath. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If you deny you’re obligations, that is infidelity which makes you and infidel. As an infidel you are not an American or a patriot you are like a weed in America’s garden, and when the weeds get out of control you will be pulled out by your roots and left to dry up in the sunshine of our liberty. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Today in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> we have been over crowded with infidel weeds that are threatening to choke out the very fruit of our liberties and it is incumbent on all patriots to get to work weeding, starting with the weeds in our government before we have to burn and lay waste to our own crops in order to replenish the land.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It’s not like we haven’t had to do this before and it’s the least desirable and most terrible resolve we can draw when our own demise as a nation is at stake, but let the infidel’s know now that unless they have a metamorphosis there are no limits we will not go to sustain our fidelity to America.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP</div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-88933506599751520252010-08-07T12:33:00.003-05:002010-08-07T12:33:15.747-05:00Mole Hills into Mountains<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Molehills into mountains; that phrase reflects the primary pettiness of American society today. We don’t listen to each other anymore, we listen for molehills that we can make into mountains and gulfs between us, much of it imaginative conjured up from the depths of our own depravity, like we actually think we know what someone else is really thinking. We then use that as the molehill to create the mountain.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Could it be that this is because we are so phony that we see everyone else as a refection of ourselves, as it refers to our own ulterior motives in everything we say and do? If a man gives a compliment does that mean he has some ulterior motive behind it? If a man says he apposes illegal immigration does that automatically mean he dislikes the ethnicity of the immigrant? If a man uses the word black in regards to another person is that just stating a fact or expressing some prejudice? Is not white, black, yellow or brown part of the visual profile that all humans share and recognize?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place> was not founded as a black and white society yet over the years is what we have constantly tried to make her. Our purpose from our founding on was to repudiate that world wide separation of people within our society as the opposite from the rest of the world’s cultures. As a nation we expressed our sincerity to accomplish that human goal with the sacrifice of over 600,000 citizens. We were not just fighting the southern states but the intrinsic nature of mankind to physically dominate over his fellow man. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>From time immortal mankind has sought to bring individuals into a collective, if not by choice then by force, that is and was the birth of human slavery. It was the stronger subjecting the weaker, might make’s right as it were.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All of this human capacity for power over others was what <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> was to overcome in the minds and hearts of our forefathers. But this is in our nature and until man can individually rule over his own human nature the capacity to dominate others with a slave master mentality we shall never move forward as a species.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>No other place on earth but <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> is the potential to be enlightened to the truth of the individuality of men/women but we cannot get there through the retrograde of the social collectives and absolutely not through the coercive power of a government collective. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Every American when push comes to shove sees him/herself as an individual first and foremost with associations or connections to others, but will always separate from them if they become possessive with demands from a collective view. This holds true wither it be family, ethnicity, gender or religious beliefs. The only rare exception is nationality. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Over the years from the birth of America as a nation and as it grew and expanded and become so diverse many have lost sight of Americas purpose and history and as their human nature became the guiding influence which causes them not to think of themselves as Americans but revert to all the very things that drove our forefathers to reject, and then create this nation in the first place. Even though a person may reside in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> no longer means they are American but retrograde Americans.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It all boils down to a state of mind and we must assimilate those in retrograde status and in a mini-collective state of mind or expel them we cannot coexist and still remain <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>. Americans are individually but one and the same.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-76344938685603701582010-07-30T16:23:00.002-05:002010-07-30T16:23:36.169-05:00Believe it, Love it, Live it<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Defining the modern liberal bent or their general social conduct after 70+ years of analysis and as accurately as possible, leads one ultimately too the animal level of thought or thinking, they function psychologically like mal- adjusted domesticated dogs that bite the hand that feeds and cares for them and would sooner attack their owner than a home intruder. They crap where they live and eat, hump your leg, then piss on it, and act like they are in charge of everyone around them, like an alpha dog. When turned loose on society they pack-up like all pack animals limited in size only by the alpha dog leaders of their packs. Each pack will viciously attack in the most personal and life threatening way, anyone or other pack without remorse, when they find themselves at cross purpose to each other. They will chew off there own leg when caught in a trap too only be destroyed by the rest of the pack due to their physical handicap or perceived weakness. They are firm believers of the coercive social commune by the tyranny of the pack as much so as all the human barbarians’ and savages of history where the “individual” is an expendable commodity of the group or pack. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Excerpt from the Declaration of <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Independence</st1:place></st1:city></b></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 200%;">Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. (Declaration of independence)</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Representatives of congress and the senate where specifically to represent their constituency within the limits set by the Constitution not their own political interests within the governmental elite.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The parties that form in the private sector to encourage voters to pick these representatives or another have no official place or authority in the governance of a free people. Their party platforms are not substitutes for the Constitution.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The press although mentioned in the constitution as to be free from government, does not give it an official or legal roll in governance, the same for religions.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The congress has the constitutional authority to set its own rules but that does not include extra constitutional rules such as forming caucuses or cabals that have the right to exclude any other elected member who wishes to participate only equal representation of their constituents is constitutional. Nor should political parties hold any official place of authority within governance, the people don’t elect parties we elect representatives. And gerrymandering of districts based on any thing but geography to achieve some perceived parity is also unconstitutional. Segregation or integration by individual choice is freedom, segregation or integration by law is unconstitutional that’s all gerrymandering does. Every law created that is not in accordance with the Constitution is null and void even if the Supreme Court says otherwise. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All of the above is the truth of the corruption that prevails in the American government today. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Even the people who elect a person to a government position like an avowed Socialist, Marxist, Islamism, Anarchists etc. cannot expect to legally change our Constitution and or laws outside of it and any attempt to do just that is unconstitutional and will result in only one way, </span><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 14.0pt; line-height: 200%;">Revolution!</span></b></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-15282943717244637202010-07-23T20:57:00.000-05:002010-07-23T20:57:05.205-05:00The Argument<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The problems in American society today when all the rhetoric is synthesized to its core ingredient is nothing more then the proper role of government in the lives of people. This argument was thoroughly debated during our founding by far more intelligent men/women then we find in the debate of today and nothing in the human condition has changed save our technology. All the arguments about energy, the environment, government etc. are just so much social and political distraction from the real issue, which is <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region>’s founding and resultant form of government. So unless someone in today's argument can show something that has change about the human condition in the intervening years what the hell are we arguing about? </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is obvious when researched that in every debate among men there are winners and losers just like in wars and the vanquished among men never or rarely accept defeat especially in the realm of the intellect, generation after generation. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>What they do, do is create a mythology that it wasn’t the weakness of their arguments but other factors that they can somehow overcome in their next efforts, even if they have to resort to force taking it out of the realm of human intellect while avoiding the original argument they lost in the past, by distorting the past. They see this effort as academic and presume themselves to be more intelligent via the human ego. This holds to their lack of intelligence in their arguments, when they have to lie and distort the past and ultimately use coercion and force, to bring about what they see as the truth of their arguments, which is precisely why they lost the arguments in the debate many generations ago against more intelligent men/women than themselves. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The strange thing about the truth of fact is once it becomes manifest to the human mind it will always remain the truth in perpetuity. The truth cannot be destroyed or changed, like death once manifest to the human mind even though some may not understand it, it is. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The ignorance and avarice of man may well destroy <st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region> in time, but the truths of <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> will live in the minds of men/women for ever, and our Constitution is the pinnacle of the most intelligent group of men/women this world has ever known. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Knowledge and the understanding that should be attached to it, is where wisdom comes into play, but the ego of man is the destroyer of that wisdom, in particular the ego of celebrity.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All men/women develop an ego which is locked into their subjective personality as they live their lives. The only personal aspect of our beings that can limit and or control the personal ego we all develop, is our objective minds.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The ego of which I speak is both self pride and self deceit to which it denies acknowledgement of either. It is like a spirit that has no form or structure, and can generally only be seen by others in the aggregate of our civil activities, quite often after the fact. It does give off subtle signals but most others miss them in the fog of celebrity until the individual achieves a full blown egotistical presence among society. The ego needs no personal encouragement; it develops to one degree or another, but unjustifiable encouragement of it is detrimental to all of society. Encouragement to achieve should never be pursued through the individual ego, but through the objective reasoning of the mind. Remember that the next time you tell your children they are special, other than to yourself.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>No living human bares responsibility for the circumstances of their birth, thus self pride or self deceit has no bearing on their linage, future or ego in the real world of our existence. History is to be learned from as to what should be emulated and what should be rejected in the here and now, absent the influence of ego. Therein is the wisdom of the ages that can provide a better future for all mankind.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The passing of any single man or group of mankind in the grand scheme of time, amounts to either positive or negative glitches overall to be enjoyed or endured by the present, but we should not let our human history get us<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>locked in the cyclic patterns of the rest of the animal life of this world. <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> has taught us better than that, I would hope.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>F. A. Hayek made the observations about societies of men and the cause and effect of their ultimate destruction. As I see it, is always do to the presumptions and the acquired powers of egotistical people within, that they, can provide and or fine tune civil and or social systems that took millions to develop over time. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>American society is not a system in the sense that it was created by other than trial and error through the minds of<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>millions and has, at its base a simple document of intent to show the way. Declare the Constitution obsolete declares the entirety of American society obsolete.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-44469723047075299392010-07-17T13:19:00.002-05:002010-07-17T13:19:46.477-05:00Leaders ?<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A lesson mankind has learned and unlearned time and again over its history “man is not a herd animal by instinct that needs a leader”. Human leaders most always mislead those that surrender their individuality to them. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This lesson or lack of; is what leads man toward what we call the collective, and away from the individuality that makes mankind the supreme animal on earth. When ever a man follows another it must be because they individually perceive intellectually that it’s the correct course of action, not because of the cult like presence of the leader. This otherwise makes us susceptible to being misled or robot like. In plain language individuals should never follow another out of intellectual blindness like herd animals. Man by his very nature is a lobo animal.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Every man/women that lays claim to the mantel of leadership is a false leader of man. Even the most reluctant of mans leaders becomes in time misleaders unintentionally, do to the ego of celebrity which is the bastard of mankind. Every society in the history of man that has succumbed to the ego of celebrity is and always has been a bastard of humanity. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Because man is by his nature a lobo animal, all collectives of man both large and small through the ego of celebrity are creations that inhibit individuality, leading us toward our own destruction. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Americans by the 1700 s became aware do to the circumstance of their migration to a land without a single over bearing ruling elite authority, making them dependant on their individuality. Once individuality becomes manifest to the mind it becomes a live free or die mindset. This is also why, that during the formation of our government the federal was to have as little as possible authority over the individual, where security of the whole was to be its overriding mandate. Americans never saw themselves as part of any collective with the exception of security and even then loosely connected, based first on their individual judgments of circumstances. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The human idea of the collective was by design to enslave the many to the few based on the theory that safety can only be secured by numbers, so individuality must be surrendered to the whole, thus The beginning of human slavery and tyranny.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The theory of collective power binds the minds of mankind keeping us from achieving our ultimate destiny by confining us to the physical condition of slaves instead of individual intelligent enlightenment, the pathway set for we Americans, by our forefathers. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-24742541236881026852010-07-10T13:18:00.001-05:002010-07-10T13:18:47.886-05:00Basic American Law<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Neither an individual citizen nor group thereof has the right or the liberty to differ or contradict the original Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">United States of America</st1:country-region></st1:place>. Those founding documents are the core of all American law. To differ or contradict those fixed laws makes all those that do so Outlaws. It is not open to discussion, that American discussion was done with once they were adopted and agreed to and if anyone or group does not like it as it was/is is free to leave America for what they may see as a better system but not free to change the one we Americans have fought and died to defend all these many years since established. </div><div class="MsoNormal">"[W]e ought to deprecate the hazard attending ardent and susceptible minds, from being too strongly and too early prepossessed in favor of other political systems, before they are capable of appreciating their own." --George Washington, letter to the Commissioners of the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:state w:st="on">District of Columbia</st1:state></st1:place>, 1795</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Freedom of speech allows anyone or group to criticize our founding documents that is not the same as trying to effect a change in them or disregard them to satisfy ones avarice. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In every society there are people that live with the overwhelming envy of others, it rules their thinking and opposition to any and all that are perceived better off in their lives than they. Because of this envy they will try anything to destroy and bring down, and they should be happy for the successes of others because it presents possibilities to their own pursuits in life while trying to emulate in order to raise themselves to the best of their ability within society and all its established laws of conduct.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When people are envious of others it makes them blind to their own potential and abilities, it is a hurdle that cannot be overcome until envy is set aside it is the heaviest of social burdens that many bear from birth. In <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">America</st1:place></st1:country-region> there are no legal obstacles only challenges to the future for any individual. If you think you have found a legal obstacle to your pursuit of happiness it is in fact an illegal obstacle placed their in spite of our Constitution by the envy of others and you should make it your first order of business to see it is remove.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>None of what I have written here will make sense to anyone who has not availed him/herself of the knowledge and understanding of the laws contained within <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Americas</st1:place></st1:country-region> founding and the men/women whom founded her. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>All Americans today need to stop waiting for someone else to tell them what the laws are and find out on your own while we still have the freedom to do it.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP</div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-37693731970276479372010-07-02T17:41:00.002-05:002010-07-02T17:41:09.192-05:00Principled Sovereignty<div class="MsoNormal">"[T]he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not ... would make the judiciary a despotic branch. ... [T]he germ of dissolution of our federal government is ... the federal Judiciary ... working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped. ... They are construing our constitution from a co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone." --Thomas Jefferson</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><br />
</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black; line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Our American Constitution established the literal primary Sovereign Authority was “THE PEOPLE” as individuals among all other people. The second Sovereign Authority was of the State among all other states, lastly the federal authority of the Republic sovereign among all other nations of the world, where assuring the States of their territorial integrity and sovereignty and our individual sovereignty was to be its primary mandate. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black; line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This was the triad of sovereign authority and powers making up the governance of <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place>. Laced up straightly within the Declaration Of Independence and the Constitution intended for perpetuity, thus no level of American government has sovereign right or authority to claim sovereignty and/or franchise of permission over the individual sovereignty of its sovereign citizens under our Constitution, except during extreme emergencies or hazard to the people as a whole or the Republic, and then only temporarily to its resolution.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black; line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The federal has no cultural sovereign authority over the states the states have no cultural sovereign authority over the people not specifically surrendered in the Constitution. From the time we as a society lost that understanding and intent we opened, “Pandora’s box” and an insurgency of human nature started a crusade of corruption on the country as a whole. (This before the ink was barely dry.) </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="color: black; line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>By violating the boundaries of any of our sovereign authorities we destroy the literal text, meaning and intent of our Constitution not only to ourselves but the world, which for two hundred and twenty two years has stood in awe of us as a Nation and as a Sovereign people. The absolute and true <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">American Dream</b> defined, was and still is <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">Individual Sovereignty.</b></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>No level of American government, not federal, state, city or town holds cultural sovereignty over the people. We are our own sovereigns individually under the Constitution. <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Americas</st1:country-region></st1:place>’ system of governance with its triad of sovereign authorities was intended to eliminate once and for all the despotic elements of human nature from it. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%; tab-stops: 549.0pt;"><span style="line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The method of despotism historically has been one man/woman rule. Modern men and women do not recognize or realize that despotism doesn’t have to emanate from the single source of a despot like a king, dictator or other such tyrants. Despotism can and does come from groups or committees through human nature and the consensus of their members. This is just as threatening to liberty and the individual sovereignty of citizens as any single despot or tyrant. This is why <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">all</b> collective systems become tyrannical and despotic via the consensus in time of their leaders.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%; tab-stops: 549.0pt;"><span style="line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We Americans have been so complacent during all these years of progressive (liberal) infringement on individual sovereignty and the liberties we all enjoyed that we almost suckered for the premise that any and all responsibilities we gave to government are exclusive to government. </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%; tab-stops: 549.0pt;"><span style="line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>They did this as example; if an individual was under attack they claimed exclusive rights of our defense, meaning we had no right to defend ourselves we had to wait and defer to their arrival, and especially no right to harm the assailant in anyway with out the threat of potential prosecution.</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%; tab-stops: 549.0pt;"><span style="line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The founding fathers constitutionally assigned some limited responsibilities to government some exclusive some not but they never in their wildest dreams thought that if the government failed in its commissions that we the people had to just sit back and take the resultant effect, like illegal immigration. You can’t get any more progressively ignorant than that. Only an ignorant person teaches his/her kids that when attacked, just stand there and take it, or try to run, or report it later. We are American; and that kind of “bullshit” don’t wash, we are sovereign individually; when we are failed we <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;">will</b> do it ourselves!! (Just ask old King George)</span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%; tab-stops: 549.0pt;"><span style="line-height: 200%; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;">GAP<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1501091042328006826.post-52237788974472278952010-06-28T09:06:00.003-05:002010-06-28T09:06:03.050-05:00Hogwash<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When it comes right down to it, people generally prefer to mind their own personal business in both their private and civil lives so why all the conflict? In America as well as other countries of the world, every community used to have individuals within that could be described only as crazies or busy bodies, and communities used to just scoff at them with out so much as a how de do. The majority couldn’t be bother with their hogwash. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>They are people so preoccupied by what other people do, they constitute an inhibitor to growth and development which equals progress in the lives of all concerned, in the most extremeness can cause serious reduction in social and cultural development by distraction from truth and reality, in plain language wastes the limited time we all have in this thing we call life. It was all just a simple matter of mudding up the overall affairs of the human community. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>On a individual basis they could be scoffed at and pushed aside with little impact overall, but as more and more free time from the ardors of survival liberated the busybodies from the industries of progress they found the powers of the collective or group would give them more impact to interfere in the lives of others, like as a pastime which overtime could actually grow into a vocation of sorts where they could convince others of their defiling hogwash.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This is what built the environmental movement it has nothing to do with our environment it’s all about interfering with the lives of others like the busybodies of yesteryear using collective powers of intimidation. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Most busybodies have a hugely exaggerated self ego of superiority, which explains how or why they think man can control nature intentionally or by accident. Nature herself creates or causes more catastrophes as mankind sees them, in single events than mankind has been able to cause in his entire existence. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Look at oil deposits and other gas or mineral deposits that are dangerous to man but to the overall world are natural. Yet if the world by its own nature caused an oil deposit to open up in an unrestricted way would man declare it a dooms day event for the whole world or just the people in a specific location. In that sense every dangerous mineral deposit in the world is a dooms day bomb, just waiting for nature or man to destroy all life on earth. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>I know that if I were BP and told the world of man that I will accept and will make good for all the damages from my error, and apologized for its occurrence in the first place, and then men turned right around and said; ‘you better damn well fix everything because were going to make you’ I might get feisty right back and change my mind to those ingrate inconsiderate elite snobs. </div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A forest fire in the process of burning uncontrolled and the men fighting it spend more resources in trying to determine how it started than how to stop it is pure ignorance. On the other hand the men fighting it determine that to stop it they must fight fire with fire by setting a backfire that will deliberately destroy more forest are refuse the authority to do that without an environmental study by men that know nothing about how to stop the fire is also ignorance.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When it comes to the world and nature in particularly mankind cannot find the answers or resolves by accelerated study. We are not smart enough! And never will be smarter than Nature in time and space. Compared to the world and the nature of it, man is no more than like gnats at a picnic, a mere nuisance! <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The collective efforts of others and their groups need to be relegated back to the status of ignorant busybody’s that carries no influence in the affairs of men, all they are selling us is pure hogwash.</div><div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 200%;">GAP <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></div>publiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15320102111292703902noreply@blogger.com0